AMMs, lending pools, yield vaults, and liquidity protocols — built with audited contracts, economic attack resistance, and frontends users actually understand. Security is the product.
Total Value Locked
$18M+
TVL Secured
Across all deployments
0
Security Incidents
Since first deployment
100%
Audit Pass Rate
Before TVL onboarding
5+
DeFi Primitives
AMM, lending, vaults…
Protocol Types
Or forked and modified — either way, audited before any TVL touches it.
Automated market makers — constant product, concentrated liquidity (Uniswap v3-style), or custom curve mechanics. Swap UI, LP position management, and fee analytics from The Graph.
Overcollateralized lending pools with dynamic interest rates, Chainlink oracle price feeds, liquidation bots, and health factor dashboards — modeled after Aave and Compound.
Reward distribution contracts, auto-compounding vaults, and multi-asset staking — with emissions schedules, multiplier mechanics, and real-time APY calculations.
Incentivize liquidity provision with token rewards. Time-weighted distribution, gauge weight voting, and LP token staking compatible with Curve-style governance.
Yield-bearing vault tokens following the ERC-4626 standard — composable with any DeFi protocol and compatible with aggregators like Yearn, Beefy, and Convex.
DEX aggregators, yield optimizers, and bridge interfaces that route users to best rates across protocols — abstracting multi-hop complexity into a clean single transaction.
Over $3B drained from DeFi protocols — same attack patterns, repeated. Every one was preventable at design time.
Flash loan exploits let attackers borrow millions with zero collateral, manipulate prices within one transaction, drain your protocol, and repay the loan — all in a single block. The DAO hack, Euler Finance, and dozens of others. By the time anyone notices, the TVL is gone. There's no refund.
Our approach
Reentrancy guards on every state-changing function, flash loan attack modeling during economic design, TWAP price oracles instead of spot prices, and invariant fuzz testing that simulates attack vectors before any deployment.
Security Standards
DeFi protocols hold real user funds. Every protocol we ship has the same security baseline — regardless of TVL target.
Financial invariants are properties that must always hold — total supply never decreases unexpectedly, reserves always cover liabilities. We test these as Foundry fuzz targets with thousands of randomized inputs.
We design oracle setups that resist manipulation — Chainlink feeds as primary source, TWAP as sanity check, circuit breakers that halt liquidations when prices move beyond expected bounds.
Even audited protocols launch with TVL caps. We deploy with configurable supply limits that let early liquidity prove the protocol works before opening to full TVL. Risk managed, not assumed.
Every DeFi protocol ships through the same 5-phase process — no shortcuts, no TVL before audit.
Token flows, fee structures, incentive alignment, and attack surface mapped before writing code. We model economic scenarios including spiral conditions, incentive breakdown, and adversarial game theory. Deliverable: economic design document and threat model.
Solidity with Foundry. Fuzz testing on every critical financial function, fork tests against mainnet state for integration testing, and invariant test suites that enforce protocol-level properties. 95%+ coverage minimum.
Slither and Mythril static analysis, internal security review covering all DeFi-specific attack vectors (flash loans, oracle manipulation, reentrancy, sandwich attacks), and gas profiling on every public function.
Third-party audit by Trail of Bits, Certik, Halborn, or OpenZeppelin — matched to protocol complexity and TVL target. Every finding resolved before mainnet. We prepare the codebase to arrive at audit clean — no wasted audit hours on known issues.
Mainnet deployment with TVL caps, Tenderly and Forta on-chain monitoring, emergency pause multi-sig, and 30 days of direct engineer access. TVL caps lifted gradually as the protocol proves itself in production.
Industries
Domain knowledge from real production protocols — not generic financial smart contract theory.
Institutional lending, cross-border payment rails, treasury yield optimization, and programmable compliance for financial institutions.
Decentralized insurance pools, parametric coverage contracts, and claim settlement automation without intermediaries.
In-game token economies, staking reward systems, play-to-earn distribution, and liquidity pools for gaming assets.
Fractional RWA lending, property-backed loan pools, rental yield distribution, and tokenized mortgage instruments.
Invoice financing, working capital pools, supplier payment automation, and trade finance on programmable rails.
On-chain fund structures, yield vault strategies, automated rebalancing, and composable portfolio primitives.
If yours is not here, reach out. We respond within 24 hours with a real answer from an engineer — not a sales pitch.

Yes, always. DeFi protocols hold real user funds. An unaudited DeFi protocol will be exploited — it's a question of when, not if. We treat audits as non-negotiable for every DeFi engagement. We coordinate with Trail of Bits, Certik, Halborn, or OpenZeppelin based on protocol complexity, TVL target, and budget.
We integrate Chainlink price feeds as the primary oracle source for any collateral or price-sensitive logic. For protocols requiring manipulation resistance, we use TWAP (time-weighted average prices) from on-chain DEX data as a secondary validation layer. Flash loan oracle attacks are mitigated by design — spot price is never used for collateral valuation.
Ethereum mainnet for maximum liquidity and composability — best for high-TVL protocols. Arbitrum and Optimism for lower gas costs without sacrificing security. Polygon for high throughput. BNB Chain for BSC-native DeFi ecosystems. We recommend L2s for most new DeFi projects: drastically lower user transaction costs, same Ethereum security model.
Yes — protocol forks are a legitimate starting point. We modify contracts for your specific mechanics, rebrand the frontend, and deploy with fresh configurations. We still require an audit even for forks — the modifications introduce new attack surfaces that the original audit didn't cover. A fork audit is typically faster and cheaper than a fresh audit.
Invariants are properties that must always hold in your protocol — for example: 'total shares can never exceed total assets in the vault.' Invariant testing uses Foundry's fuzz engine or Echidna to generate thousands of random transaction sequences and check that invariants hold across all of them. For financial logic, this catches entire classes of economic bugs that unit tests miss.
A focused protocol — a staking vault, a single lending market, or an AMM pool — typically runs $40K–$90K in development. A full lending platform or yield aggregator with governance and multi-asset support lands in the $100K–$250K range. External audits add $30K–$150K depending on TVL and complexity. We scope a fixed quote after the mechanism-design phase, with milestone-based payments.
We model the token economics before writing code — emission schedules stress-tested against demand, sink mechanisms matched to rewards, and spiral-condition analysis. Pools use Chainlink and TWAP oracles instead of spot price, ReentrancyGuard on every state-changing function, and per-block rate limits. Every financial invariant is fuzz-tested with Foundry or Echidna so flash-loan and manipulation vectors are caught before mainnet.
You own 100% of the contracts, frontend, subgraph, and deployment infrastructure — full source, deployer keys, and documentation handed over on delivery. Every engagement includes 30 days of direct engineer access plus on-chain monitoring and anomaly alerts, the highest-risk window for any DeFi launch. Ongoing monitoring and maintenance retainers are available for protocols that want continuous coverage.
“We needed smart contract work done right — no shortcuts. Their blockchain team audited, optimized, and deployed our DeFi protocol with zero post-launch issues.”
Alex Chen
Founder · Meridian DeFi · Singapore
Tell us your protocol concept, target chain, and TVL projections. We'll design the right economic model and security architecture before writing a line of code.

Related Services